Why UK Should Avoid Restricting VPNs to Protect Online Privacy and Security

Restricting VPN use in the UK risks undermining national cybersecurity and personal privacy while failing to effectively protect children. Learn why age-gating VPNs is a technical and practical dead-end.

Why UK Should Avoid Restricting VPNs to Protect Online Privacy and Security
Hannah Ford

Hannah Ford

Privacy & VPN Editor

Focuses on online privacy, VPN services, and digital security tools.

Why are VPNs crucial for online security and privacy?

VPNs (virtual private networks) serve as essential tools that secure internet connections, protect user data on public Wi-Fi, and maintain anonymity online. They are widely used not only by individuals for personal safety but also by vulnerable groups such as journalists, human rights defenders, domestic abuse survivors, and the LGBTQ+ community who rely on the privacy VPNs provide to reduce risks of surveillance or online attacks.

Disrupting VPN accessibility could therefore weaken the core security layer that millions depend on daily, exposing users to greater cyber risks and jeopardizing digital human rights protections.

What would happen if the UK imposes age restrictions on VPNs?

Children's circumvention behaviours online - GOV.UK
Children's circumvention behaviours online - GOV.UK

The proposed plan to require VPN providers to verify users’ ages (age-gating) would force users to submit sensitive personal information just to use VPN services. This undercuts the anonymity that VPNs are designed to provide. The technical implementation of such restrictions is problematic — it is effectively impossible to block VPN traffic reliably without disrupting legitimate usage.

This could lead users and organizations to seek out less transparent or unregulated privacy tools, potentially reducing overall online safety and increasing vulnerability to data exploitation.

Do VPN restrictions actually protect children online?

Research shows VPN use by children to bypass content restrictions is minimal (roughly 3%). Furthermore, children often circumvent age verifications through simple workarounds like providing false information. Restricting VPNs is unlikely to significantly curb harmful content exposure.

Effective online safety should focus on stronger enforcement of platform responsibilities, improved parental controls, digital literacy education, and policies that embed safety and privacy in service design rather than undermining key security technologies.

What are the broader implications for users and digital rights?

VPNs are under fire, as new UK government survey says 22% of kids are using  them
VPNs are under fire, as new UK government survey says 22% of kids are using them

Mandating age checks for VPNs threatens the privacy of all users, weakening the internet’s security infrastructure. It disproportionately affects those needing privacy protections most and could lead to censorship, reduced freedom of expression, and increased surveillance risks.

Therefore, safeguarding VPN access aligns with upholding digital rights, maintaining cybersecurity, and ensuring online safety efforts are practical and effective.

React to this story

Related Posts