How Businesses Should Prepare for Post-Quantum Security Risks

Explore critical steps, core challenges, and practical advice for organizations adapting to quantum-safe encryption as quantum computing disrupts internet security.

How Businesses Should Prepare for Post-Quantum Security Risks
Andrew Wallace

Andrew Wallace

Professional Tech Editor

Focuses on professional-grade hardware, software, and enterprise solutions.

What Changes for Business Security in a Post-Quantum World?

Quantum computing poses a unique threat to traditional cryptography—algorithms protecting today's internet traffic could be easily broken by sufficiently powerful quantum computers. This creates an urgent need for organizations to prepare for a world where encrypted data can be decrypted almost instantly, making conventional public-key cryptography obsolete for future-proof confidentiality and authentication.

Some attackers are already collecting encrypted traffic now, intending to decrypt it later once quantum capabilities arrive. Meanwhile, new regulations and standards are emerging to guide early preparations, and many browsers and services quietly use post-quantum or hybrid cryptography for key exchanges today.

Key Infrastructure and Organizational Challenges

Exclusive: OpenSSL on how to prepare for post-quantum internet | TechRadar
Exclusive: OpenSSL on how to prepare for post-quantum internet | TechRadar

Moving to quantum-resistant security isn't just about replacing cryptographic libraries—it's a significant overhaul. The main hurdle is the much larger digital signatures required by new quantum-safe algorithms, which can sharply increase handshake size in protocols such as TLS. This can affect latency, especially on mobile, low-bandwidth, or lossy connections, stretching beyond the limits of what's handled efficiently today. Instead of simply increasing bandwidth, the solution involves redesigning parts of the public key infrastructure (PKI): for example, adopting Merkle tree certificates and new trust mechanisms.

Another key issue is asset prioritization and budget management. Organizations can't meaningfully plan a migration without a full inventory of all cryptographic usage. This can take 6–12 months, but it's becoming a regulatory requirement. Security leaders should invest in agile systems able to adapt to future algorithmic changes, rather than relying on any particular 'quantum-safe' product, as standards are likely to evolve.

Backward Compatibility and Practical Migration Strategies

Organizations face the challenge of maintaining business operations during the transition. Technologies such as hybrid key establishment (deployed via TLS 1.3), composite certificates, and dual-chain approaches allow for continued compatibility with legacy systems while adopting quantum-safe encryption. Underlying this, cryptographic abstraction layers in libraries like OpenSSL let teams switch algorithms without modifying application code—an essential capability as standards mature.

However, hybrid solutions are transitional and require planning for eventual replacement. Secure hardware, embedded systems, and devices with long lifespans need early attention, as they may not be upgradeable later. Regulatory deadlines may force the replacement of such equipment outright if migration isn't possible.

How Open Source and Regulation Shape the Quantum Transition

Exclusive: OpenSSL on how to prepare for post-quantum internet | TechRadar
Exclusive: OpenSSL on how to prepare for post-quantum internet | TechRadar

Open source cryptographic projects play a crucial role in achieving true cross-vendor interoperability in post-quantum security. Real-world compatibility and rapid scrutiny happen through open, shared implementations—not only in standards documents. However, the funding and validation of open source security are lagging well behind industry dependence. Government regulations are tightening, introducing cryptographic bills of materials (CBOMs) and specifying transition timelines, but small organizations may lack adequate tools and guidance compared to large enterprises.

Meanwhile, current regulations often overlook certain embedded and operational technologies with long service lives—these lack clear upgrade paths and may require expensive replacement rather than a simple software update.

What Should Businesses and Ordinary Users Do Next?

For CISOs and IT managers, the priority is to begin or accelerate inventorying cryptographic assets and invest in systems designed for agility and future upgrades. Focus first on assets that require long-term confidentiality (which might be vulnerable to retrospective decryption) and mission-critical authenticating hardware. For most software-driven systems, staying current with updates will handle much of the transition automatically.

Regular users are unlikely to notice most of these changes, as browsers and software vendors silently introduce quantum-resilient upgrades. However, users may experience slightly slower first connections, more firmware updates, and some loss of device support where hardware can't be updated.

Takeaway: Proactive Planning Is Essential for a Quantum-Safe Future

Exclusive: OpenSSL on how to prepare for post-quantum internet | TechRadar
Exclusive: OpenSSL on how to prepare for post-quantum internet | TechRadar

Quantum computing poses a credible threat to today's encryption, and the shift to quantum-safe algorithms will be an architectural transformation rather than just a technical upgrade. Businesses should start by mapping existing cryptographic dependencies and prioritize flexibility over specific products. Regulatory requirements, evolving standards, and hidden hardware vulnerabilities make long-term planning and agile security approaches essential for organizations seeking to avoid future risks as the post-quantum era unfolds.

React to this story

Related Posts